It's been a while.
There've been many changes. Nick Ramsey has no doubt been stumbling
through the Ty Hywel corridors to Every Rose Has Its Thorn.
However, I
couldn't resist returning to the rock stars of the Assembly Committee
world – Business & Enterprise – and their inquiry report into EU
funding opportunities from 2014-2020, which was launched at Cardiff's Chapter
Arts Centre last week (pdf).
A lot of this work overlaps
with the Constitutional & Legislative Affairs Committee inquiry
into the Welsh role in EU decision-making.While that inquiry focused on
the political and constitutional situation, this one was more focused
on the economic, cultural and financial side of things.
The one
thing you can take from both inquiries is the need for a clear strategy on
Welsh involvement with the EU. It's a point raised before, but
Scotland and the Republic of Ireland have a "more joined up
approach" than we do. Meanwhile, concerns that EU funds in Wales have been
misused, or Wales being constantly "left off the map", mean a revision of the Welsh Government's EU
strategy is long overdue – something Finance Minister Jane Hutt
(Lab, Vale of Glamorgan) is considering.
There were 16
recommendations in total, summarised as :
- Ensuring any future
EU strategy (Wales in Europe : What role do we play?) sets clear objectives and
maximises Welsh involvement in EU programmes.
- Developing tailored
support; including the creation of an EU Funding Champion, a central
contact point for EU funds and specialist support for the youth,
transport and education sectors.
- Addressing gaps in Welsh
representation in Brussels (also raised in the Welsh EU role inquiry)
- Setting clear objectives for Welsh universities to promote
both studying abroad and language courses as well as creating an alumnus of
international students.
- Local Government should develop their own
action plans to make best use of EU funds.
- Champion the Welsh
creative sector in Europe, ensuring they're not disadvantaged in
applying for EU funding because of the UK's strong TV
industry.
- Develop a closer working relationship with DG Move and
TEN-T executives in Brussels - as well as the Irish – to ensure
Wales gets the most out of pan-EU transport programmes.
EU
Programmes – What are they?
When discussing "EU Programmes" in Wales, you'll
automatically think "Objective One" (Structural Funds) or
the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). There are, however, EU schemes that cover other activities and sectors
worth up to €42billion. The inquiry focused on how Wales engages with these programmes and what can
be done to ensure we get the most out of them.
These programmes include
:
- Erasmus+ (€14.7bn)
- Connecting Europe/Trans-European
Transport Networks (TEN-T) (€15bn)
- Regional Cooperation (INTERREG)
(€8.7bn)
- Creative Europe (€1.46bn)
- Competitiveness of Small
& Medium Sized Companies (COSME) (€2.03bn)
There's also
the Horizon 2020 scheme which covers science and
technology, but this wasn't within the inquiry's remit.
Welsh
engagement with EU programmes
 |
The EU Commission's Creative Europe programme helped fund Y Gwyll, but there were
concerns that the strength of the UK's media sector may disadvantage Wales.
(Pic : The Guardian) |
Although Wales engages with
many of these programmes – like INTERREG, Creative Europe and some
of the education programmes - a recurring theme is that the high
priority and narrow focus given to structural funds (Objective One
and CAP) has limited Welsh involvement elsewhere.
There are
specialist European officers in local government and higher education
– often with a presence in Brussels – but there's nothing similar
for the youth, private and voluntary sectors. The benefits from
participating in these programmes are potentially huge and such
groups may be missing out unnecessarily.
In the Welsh Government's evidence they say some programmes are
easier to work with and win funding from than others, so they often
had to target their resources carefully. They intend to review how
they interact with the EU, but with no set timetable. This led to the
Committee supporting previous calls for a full EU Strategy, citing the Irish and Danish governments own successful
strategies.
It was said Wales isn't "as switched on"
as other countries, with an example given of one academic who was working with the INTERREG programme having no contact whatsoever with the
Wales European Funding Office (WEFO). There was also a lack
of proper communication with businesses, with calls for a "clear
contact point" based outside Wales for foreign companies looking
to work with Welsh partners.
There was a specific focus on the
creative industries sector, and the EU programme Creative Europe. The
EU Commission's media programme "provides
support for film productions from pre-production through to
distribution, primarily in the form of direct grants to companies and
organisations". This scheme provided support towards the
production of Y Gwyll/Hinterland.
Media Antenna Wales –
part of the Welsh Government's creative industries team – provides
support to companies and producers seeking to work with Creative
Europe, often helping them negotiate the bureaucracy and form-filling
that comes with EU programmes. This level of specialist support was
praised and said to be something to emulate in other sectors.
There
was, however, a worry that because the UK has a "strong
audio-visual industry" overall, Welsh creative companies would be
overlooked or disadvantaged when applying for EU funds. Better
Together?
International
Mobility
 |
Although Wales attracts its fair share of Erasmus funding and
participation, twice as many students are incoming as outgoing.
(Pic : BBC) |
Erasmus, now
reformed into Erasmus+, is a general exchange programme aimed
at all aspects of the university sector. The British Council is in
charge of this at a UK level and says Wales is "attracting its
share of the budget in relation to population size" (€11million
between 2006-07 and 2012-13).
The benefits of
participating in Erasmus are said to include : greater employability,
improved self-esteem and there was evidence that academic performance
improves too. There's also a knock-on impact to universities
themselves, as Erasmus can leave a good impression on students
studying here and could be adapted to provide a trade boost that runs
into the tens of millions of pounds.
One big barrier is
that there are twice as many incoming students to Wales as there are
outgoing. Lower Welsh take-up rates are said to be down to numerous factors
like : language barriers, lack of engagement by academics, lack of
awareness, financial problems and lack of confidence. Also,
participation was markedly lower from "new
universities".
Cardiff University's Prof. Colin Riordan
set a target of 17% of graduating students spending some study time
abroad by 2017, having set up a £1.6million bursary fund to help
achieve it. At the moment the rate is 12%.
Despite his
ambition being praised, these levels of participation fall far short
of Germany, which has a 50% target. Prof. Riordan said levels of
engagement on this matter with the Welsh Government were "low"
and that it wasn't afforded a high level of status.
Colegau Cymru suggested the creation of a "one-stop shop" within
the Welsh Government for lifelong learning programmes, while Swansea
University suggested the Welsh Government could do more to help
universities and colleges access EU funding programmes.
There
was also confusion over youth volunteering and youth work. The
British Council no longer want to work with devolved bodies on this
(in Wales' case Connect Cymru), but said that was because they're
changing how they're working with them as there was little evidence
of the benefits and effectiveness of youth work and youth
volunteering programmes.
International Co-operation
 |
A lot of the Welsh participation in INTERREG is wrapped up in the Ireland-Wales programme.
(Pic : EU Commission) |
There
were 89 INTERREG projects in Wales during the 2007-13 funding period,
attracting €41.5million in EU funding. Most of this went towards
Irish-Welsh co-operation.
Colegau Cymru said there are
specific challenges here, as in order to get funding, projects need
to be managed not only across institutions but across borders around
the EU. Milford Haven Port Authority also said there hadn't been
enough engagement with the private sector.
Local councils say
that while they've participated in programmes like INTERREG, much of
their focus has been on structural funding (Objective One, European
Social Fund) and rural development. They pointed towards the
lack of Welsh Government advice and contacts, with
Conwy Council adding – in rather parochial terms – that "their
only priority is their own local area".
The Committee
underlined the lack of a joined-up approach, but also a lack of
ambition by local councils, which is "in marked contrast to the
further education sector". They called on the WLGA to display
leadership.
Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T)
 |
Wales - left off an EU map....again.
And the Welsh Government hasn't helped matters either.
(Pic : ITV Wales) |
TENT-T
is described as a "set of strategically significant road, rail,
air, water transport networks" identified by the EU as
particularly important to the internal market.
Wales isn't
currently on any of the core network corridors, though Business &
Economy Minister, Edwina Hart (Lab, Gower) said Welsh experts were
sent as part of the UK team when drafting the maps. Milford Haven
and the north Wales coast mainline were subsequently added at the request of the
UK Government.
Milford Haven Port Authority say there's a significant
amount of money that could be available to Wales to develop freight
facilities, but too much focus has been on passengers. Holyhead
was also excluded from TEN-T as a core port, despite its pretty
important role in linking Great Britain to Ireland – though it
falls short of Liverpool in terms of tonnage.The Committee say that
the negotiating process between Cardiff, London and Brussels was
"confused and opaque".
Also, in an
astonishing admission, Wales didn't make any applications to, and secured no
funding from, the TEN-T programme as of January 2014. Edwina Hart has
confirmed, however, that a business case for improvements to the
Crewe-Holyhead railway through TEN-T is underway.
The Answer : "Wales could do
more"
To repeat myself, there's a clear need for some sort of high level strategy
– as much as I loathe such things – and many of the Committee's
recommendations make sense. EU programmes also have to be put in a much wider context than structural and agricultural funds as they have important cultural and educational aspects as well.
The lack of proper
engagement with TEN-T, however, is a hidden national disgrace and
signifies incredible laziness on the part of the Welsh Government. Even a slither of TEN-T funding could've gone a long way
towards bringing forward projects like rail electrification or
upgrading parts of the A55. I suppose they deserve credit for
getting the ball rolling on the north Wales mainline at least.
I suppose
in a way this is a complement or follow-up to my 2012 post -"What Wales gets from the European Union".
The answer is,
quite clearly, "a lot". If the Welsh Government properly organised itself and started to
put the work in the answer would be "even more" - and not just in monetary terms.