In September 2011,
Deputy Minister for Skills, Jeff Cuthbert (Lab, Caerphilly), launched
a review into qualifications for 14-19 year olds. That, presumably,
encompasses :
- GCSEs
- AS & A-Levels
- Welsh
Baccalaureate
- NVQs
The board set up to oversee the review
reported back a few weeks ago. There were a comprehensive 42
recommendations in total. Here's summary the proposals.
A
National Qualifications System
|
Is the formation of Qualifications Wales
the beginning of the end for the WJEC?
(Pic : CMB Engineering) |
- A national qualifications
framework that would "allow divergence from the rest of the
UK."
- The establishment of a single qualifications body for
Wales (Qualifications Wales) that would regulate, award and carry out
quality assurance of all non-degree qualifications, "learning
from the model in operation in Scotland".
- Vocational
qualifications of the highest value to the Welsh economy should be
taught in both English and Welsh, with clearer pathways for Welsh
medium students.
Qualifications Wales was launched last week by
Education Minister Leighton Andrews (Lab, Rhondda) as an independent
body to oversee exams. There have already been rumours that it might
be a replacement/successor to the existing WJEC. It sounds very similar
to the Scottish model, where the Scottish Qualifications Authority
(SQA) sets and regulates Standards, Highers, vocational courses and
some higher education courses (HNDs, HNCs).
It also raises
questions about Ofqual's future role in Wales. Has Leighton taken
Ofqual in house? That would be a pretty big development, as until now
there's been some ambiguity about who's in charge of what, which
partially led to August's GCSE row.
The expansion of bilingual
vocational courses matches Leighton's own Welsh Language Strategy for
2012-2017. I think the reason there've been specific problems here,
is because some Welsh medium secondary schools might not have the
equipment/facilities to provide vocational courses in the same way an
FE college might. Perhaps one way to get around this would've been to
designate an existing WM secondary within a region as a "regional
Welsh medium FE centre" – effectively a WM sixth form/FE
college.
And despite the doom and gloom over today's census figures, one crumb of hope is that Welsh-speakers amongst younger age groups are increasing. I think a big contributing factor in the decline has been outward migration of Welsh-speakers in their 20s and 30s due to lack of job opportunities and affordable housing in Y Fro. If youngsters are going to learn Welsh, they need as many opportunities as possible to use it - including vocational courses.
The Welsh Baccalaureate
|
The Welsh Baccalaureate might become
the "headline performance measure" from 2017.
(Pic : Click on Wales) |
- A more rigorous Welsh
Baccalaureate at GCSE (Key Stage 4) and A-Level/Further Education
(Key Stage 5) that should include a "broadly based core"
and include more rigorous testing of literacy and numeracy.
- The
Welsh Government should encourage "universal adoption" on
the revised Welsh Bacc.
- Attainment of the Welsh Bacc. should be
the "headline performance measure" from 2017.
- The Welsh
Bacc. will be graded from 2015.
I'm not convinced the changes
here are as significant as made out, with exception to that the last two, which I'll
return to later. It appears as though the Welsh Bacc is going to be
as important at GCSE, and vocational courses, as it is at
A-Level.
It's not too different from Michael Gove's English
Baccalaureate. To get the Welsh Bacc, learners will need to, seemingly, pass GCSE English/Welsh language and Maths at the very
minimum (or A-Levels at Advanced level). However, unlike England,
there's no specific requirements for what's deemed "good GCSEs".
The core parts of the Welsh Bacc appears unchanged.
I think
that's a missed opportunity. I would've preferred a move to the
French or Dutch model, and I've outlined my thoughts on that before.
I would've also included a second language as a compulsory element,
but there are probably issues there in terms of staffing at schools
that might have made it impractical for now. But with novel teaching methods, maybe it needn't be.
What's interesting is that
attainment of the Welsh Bacc. will be the "headline performance
indicator" from 2017. Does that mean the end of GCSE/A-Level
results day in Wales, and the beginning of "Welsh Bacc
attainment day"? It's said it would be "raising the bar in
terms of of expectations about the qualifications learners should
achieve." Without it being like the French or Dutch model, I
don't see why it would to be honest.
GCSEs
|
GCSE Maths might be split into separate numeracy and
technique-focused qualifications.
(Pic : The Guardian) |
- GCSEs should
be retained as the main 14-16 qualification.
- A full review of GCSE
English Language and GCSE Welsh First Language to build on literacy
standards outlined in the Literacy and Numeracy Framework.
- The
introduction of two Mathematics GCSEs – One covering numeracy and
the other covering mathematical techniques.
- Literacy and numeracy
standards should be integrated into all new GCSEs proposed by the
Welsh Government.
It's said that the current qualifications
don't give potential employers "sufficient confidence in the
skills of young people". It's said, for example, that the
benchmark of a C-grade for English/Welsh language GCSE or Mathematics
"doesn't guarantee sufficient literacy or numeracy."
I
think splitting maths GCSE is an excellent idea. Mathematical concepts like trigonometry are only valuable in certain
career paths. Not everyone needs to learn that, but I imagine if you
want to go to university, you will have to take the Mathematics
Techniques GCSE. So, in future, Maths GCSE will be (sort of)
double-award like science. It does appear as though GCSE Mathematical
Techniques will be optional, but the expectation is that most
learners would take both.
The modular/unit model will be
retained, but with only one resit per module/unit. The grading
structure for GCSEs will also be reviewed at a later date.
Another
welcome development, is that the review recognises that GCSE
questions need to be more like PISA. I believed that one of the
reasons we lag behind, is that the GCSE syllabus is based on broader
concepts, not practical applications – unlike the PISA test.
Keeping GCSEs could be seen as a major divergence from
England, where they appear to be moving towards a return to
"O-Levels". The GCSE "brand" is recognised, so it
would've been a mistake to change it. The only thing that needs
changing is the structure of the courses, and the review recommends
greater flexibility in designing courses to meet the requirements of
individual subjects.
A-Levels
- A-Levels should be
retained as the main 16-19 qualification, maintained similarly to
England and Northern Ireland (with room for variations).
- Ensure
employers and universities are involved in developing new A-Levels
- At
least two units of : Literacy, numeracy, "wider key skills"
and digital literacy will need to be taken to Level 3 (A-Level)
standard, with the other two to Level 2 standard (GCSE
A*-C).
A-Levels are said to be "fit for purpose"
with a "strong brand and support". There's support for the
AS/A2 "split" as it allows learners to take a broader
curriculum. Getting universities involved in the development of
A-Levels makes sense, but their involvement might not be as extensive
as implied.
There's also a continuation of Curriculum 2000's Key Skills element. That's not a major change from
existing arrangements, but perhaps will be taken a little more
seriously if the Welsh Bacc. is to become the main benchmark to judge
attainment.
Vocational Qualifications
- Recognise
vocational qualifications as on a par with general (academic)
ones.
- Welsh Government and Qualifications Wales should ensure that
assessment of vocational qualifications is "rigorous, valid and
proportionate".
There's a recommendation to adopt a
European definition for vocational qualifications. The first (IVET)
is pre-occupational training – for example, in a school or FE
college environment. The second is on-the-job training (CVET) –
presumably covering things like professional accreditation.
For
14-16 year olds, vocational qualifications would be more general
sector based than occupational based. I presume that means students
would be introduced to a wider range of theories and concepts than a
specific role. So an "automotive" qualification might cover
all aspects of the automotive industry, not just mechanics. If it is
like that, then I think it's long overdue and would seriously boose
the credibility of vocational qualifications in the eyes of the
media, students and employers.
For 16-19 year olds, the
emphasis would be on specific vocational roles, as per the
European definitions listed above.
Vocational qualifications
would be based around National Occupational Standards, where sector
bodies themselves will be able to rate vocational qualifications and
try to identify gaps that can be plugged.
It's proposed that
monitoring/moderation/marking of vocational qualifications is given
"appropriate externality in assessment". At the moment,
perhaps understandably, it's probably mainly internal assessment.
They're not suggesting moving to a wholescale external
marking/monitoring system, but instead drawing up a "proper
assessment of competence and skills" that could be applied
across the board.
Overview
There are two big
developments here : the creation of Qualifications Wales, and the
Welsh Baccalaureate becoming the attainment benchmark from 2017.
Many of the other proposals are welcome, but I doubt they're
as radical or transformative as they could've been. The review, in
effect, is "radical" by keeping large chunks the way they
are - as opposed to what's happening in England.
I don't think
there would've been much justification for scrapping GCSEs and
A-Levels anyway, but I fear the Welsh Baccalaureate is going to
remain "A-Level General Studies on steroids" when I
would've preferred a move to a French-style Baccalaureate. Maybe that
could happen in the future, but – as is the Welsh way – problems
that could be sorted out now have to be kicked down the road for the
sake of consensus building.
I think "Key Skills" is a flawed
concept, and I say that as someone who's actually been through it.
The curriculum itself – all subjects - should change to include
more literacy, numeracy and use of IT, not have them bolted on as
extras. You probably use as much maths in science and subjects like
geography as you would in a "numeracy unit" for an Advanced
Welsh Bacc.
But, all in all, it's yet another "step
forward". I think the changes to vocational qualifications in
particular are long overdue, and there's a clear commitment on
Leighton Andrews' behalf – and his deputy - to grab the bull by the
horns so to speak.
Maybe we're finally going to start to see
things turn around for the better in Welsh schools. However,
qualifications are as much about content as they are about attainment
and teaching methods. The Welsh national curriculum needs to be
reviewed too, or none of this will make any difference. I think, once
the OECD have reviewed Welsh education, that should be Leighton Andrews' and
Jeff Cuthbert's next port of call.