Monday, 12 November 2012

Housing London

Harlow, Essex  - one of many  "new towns" built to cope with London's population growth.
Due to decades of short-sightedness by Westminster,  it looks like Wales
is about to become home to evacuees in a new wave of "expulsions".
(Pic : Wikipedia)
In the last few weeks, it's been revealed that London's local authorities are planning to purchase houses across EnglandandWales, to "temporarily" move people out of the Imperial Capital, once stricter housing benefit reforms come into force. More on this at : Jac o' the North, National Left, Borthlas and Valleys Mam.

One local authority highlighted as a refugee camp is Merthyr Tydfil. I presume any local authority with access to the M4 and South Wales Mainline will be seen as suitable, though it remains to be seen if other local authorities will be drafted.

And let's face it, similar things have been happening for some time, especially along the north Wales coast. If it's good enough for Scousers, Mancs and Brummies, then it's good enough for Londoners too. There's nothing (AFAIK) Welsh local authorities, or the Welsh Government, can do to prevent another local authority in another part of the state buying up cheap, empty housing stock.

People migrate back and forth across national, and sub-national, borders all the time. Usually, that's for employment reasons. People moving for work makes sense, because they can better themselves and their families and they contribute to the local economy. Let's just say that I doubt the people being "expelled" from London will be the cream of the lower-middle and working classes.

That's precisely what Wales and northern England needs right now – more people, looking for fewer jobs. It's like a twisted, reverse version of The Grapes of Wrath.

We constantly hear how London and South East England are the economic engine of the UK. So logically, shouldn't movement be in the opposite direction?

We can call it "Take in a Taff", and have a soppy TV appeal. Can live in the garage of your Belgravia townhouse. Comes house-trained and vaccinated. Requires regular walks and rugby pitches. Will find deep holes irresistible.

More seriously, I said this in response to the Welsh Government's Housing White Paper back in May:

"I'm afraid that the Welsh Government's broadly positive aims to reduce it (homelessness) might be exploited by local authorities elsewhere in the UK to "dump their problems on us". Despite the trend of falls in homelessness numbers, the Welsh Government could inadvertently let the UK Government off the hook for their welfare and housing reforms, and be left to pick up the pieces and the price tag. "

We knew London boroughs were planning something along these lines, but perhaps thought that they wouldn't be cretinous/heartless enough to go through with it. Well, here we are.

It's estimated there'll be around 200,000 possible "evacuees" from London alone, though I imagine only a few hundred would move to Wales. They'll likely be larger families, who live in large houses and flats on social housing estates in areas where rents are higher - swankier districts like Westminster and Kensington & Chelsea for example.

Even if it's temporary, they'll need new schools and new GPs. They'll need temporary jobs too – good luck with that. Everything they will have been used to – as London is a different planet compared to most of Wales – will be turned on its head. Try swapping the Underground and London Bus for Arriva Trains Wales, First Cymru and Stagecoach.

They're likely to be quite angry about being forced/coerced to move too, and they'll take it out on the people whose doorsteps they've been left on – Welsh local authorities and the Welsh Government.

The Welsh Government can do three things.

They can send the equivalent of a strongly-worded letter (because devolution is toothless). They can keep their fingers crossed that this is a political stunt (as John Dixon said). Or they can prepare for the inevitable.

For the latter, there's the opportunity to come up with great-sounding social enterprises and third sector bodies, and plonk some failed political candidate in to channel EU funds yadda, yadda, yadda.

None of this solves the underlying problems : high rents, high cost of living and lack of affordable housing in London.

The old way of solving this, was pulling people to new towns constructed around the M25 - the so-called "London overspill". NIMBYs and the economic crisis put paid to that, but if you want to live next to a Global City, I think you should expect it to acquire more breathing room as it grows. There's no way that the new developments in Stratford related to the Olympics will solve the problem by itself either. You need thirty or forty Stratfords.

The Welsh Government (and some local authorities in Wales & England) have been very accommodating to "other people's problems" down the years. Their quest for an all-encompassing, obtuse definition of "social justice", has lead to London boroughs seriously considering this as a viable option.

Thanks for selling us out cheap.

We have to remember, that it's not the tenants fault that since the 1970s, the UK has become useless at planning for anything that requires longer than 10 years of forethought – look at energy, transport and now housing and welfare.

Despite being portrayed as a megalopolis with streets paved with gold, London has levels of deprivation that would make Welsh Labour teeth itch. While Wales remains part of the UK, we shouldn't ignore that, perhaps because things in Wales aren't half as bad as they appear to be.

This proposal is....quite extraordinary. History has shown us that coerced and forced movements rarely end well – for those being moved, or the areas to which they are moved to.

It's funny. Whenever I doubt my commitment to independence, you can always rely on the UK Government, or other "great British institutions", to take a dump with their trousers on, reassuring me that it's the right choice.

10 comments:

  1. 'They can send the equivalent of a strongly-worded letter (because devolution is toothless). They can keep their fingers crossed that this is a political stunt (as John Dixon said). Or they can prepare for the inevitable.'

    Apart from the Huw Lewis press release have any of our politicians breathed a word on the issue? Not so much as a tweet, and the media are letting them off the hook.

    They are burying their heads in the sand and hoping nbody notices.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In fairness, they can't really do anything until there's a decision one way or another. And even if there were a decision, there'd be very little they can do about it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We surely would have heard if they (London Councils) had started mopping up property in Merthyr. Wouldn't we?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's important to stress that these are only "plans" at the moment, Anon. But "plans" can quickly turn into reality, and the housing benefit cap is just around the corner.

    It could be done in deals with housing associations, local authorities directly, or it's just more cost effective for a London borough to rent a private home in Wales than to put up a family somewhere like Westminster. Like I said, I doubt there would be more than a few hundred at most moved to Wales if it happens.

    But the principle's wrong whether it's 100 or 100,000.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The former Group Projects Director for A2Dominion Housing Group, who was responsible for managing 34,000 social homes throughout London was Barbara Harrington. She has now been appointed to the board of RCT Homes and is tasked with raising a revenue stream in RCT Homes. It's quite a straightforward operation. She knows all the purse strings and requirements in London and seeks to provide social re-housing, squeeze out a surplus, an operation of moving the unemployable from London boroughs to new so called 'self financing' social housing schemes such as the Penrhys. I don't know why so much secrecy is involved. It's social dumping on a grand scale.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is going to be a nightmare for public services and the Welsh economy. It will seriously compromise the Welsh Government's policies and budgets; depending on how many people are uprooted and moved.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anon 15:10 - I don't know why there's so much secrecy in these things either, and I'm getting pissed off with it.

    Anon 17:42 - It'll certainly put a strain, but it's supposed to be "temporary" (and we all know how "temporary" turns out). If the London boroughs made a contribution to Welsh local authorities taking them in for however long it is, then maybe it won't be too much of a problem.

    My guess, as I said, is that we're talking hundreds of people. If I had to pull a figure out of the air I'd say 3-400. We'll see.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There are other factors as well.

    This will drive up the price of rents in the private sector in the areas the London Boroughs use. Private landlords outside of Cardiff, Swansea, Wrecsam charge 400-450pcm for a two bed terraced. The London Boroughs will quite happily pay 800pcm for a long lease because that is still a bargain for them. And which do you think the private landlord will opt for? the 'local' tenant? Or the London dollar? That then impacts on private housing - it creates a shortage of rental properties and also because the rental market becomes highly lucrative, attracts more BTL landlords and thus pushing house prices up.

    Then there's other potential problems such as Cymraeg schools - how will they cope with batches of kids of all ages who can't speak a word of it and in a lot of cases only have limited English ability as well.

    Then apparently after two years, if they are still in that area, they become that local authoritiy's responsibility. - Now there's a thought, family moved to Wales by a London Borough, into rented accommodation leased/owned by a London Borough. Two years and one day down the line served with a termination of tenancy and an eviction. They then become high priority for social housing in the authority they are in.

    ReplyDelete
  9. But are they still just 'plans'? the article you linked to said the move was already underway, and that London councils are already aquiring properties.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks for the comments.

    Red Flag - That's a good point. Hopefully the Welsh Government's proposed reforms to the private renting sector might be able to do something there. I don't think they'll be that brazen though (not as if it doesn't happen already but still).

    I think your last point is the clincher though. If it appears Welsh local authorities or the Welsh Government are a "soft touch" then it might encourage other larger cities to follow suit. That's the point I made back in May and quoted in this post. I think Huw Lewis is going to have to review some of his proposals.

    WA - It's hard to tell to be honest. But I presume they'll only be "plans" until the first tenants are moved. Like John Dixon pointed out, I suspect it might be some sort of game to put pressure on the UK Government. Hypothetical scenarios of people being put on buses with all their belongings and sent down the M4 won't go down to well I'd imagine.

    ReplyDelete