I was going to post
something on Bridgend Recreation Centre today, but that can wait as there's been only one
story dominating the Welsh cybersphere – and not in a good
way.
This morning, the Western Mail, on its front page, published a "controversial" and harshly-worded editorial on possible future translation costs at the Assembly - accompanied by a picture of the dullest line up for Celebrity Squares in known history.
Proposed amendments to the Official Languages Bill - currently going through the legislative process - would require all proceedings to be bilingual - including committees - when at present, only plenary meetings are subject to it. The editorial claims that the projected £400,000 cost is excessive at a time when "budgets are squeezed and public services are being cut".
The Western Mail have been building up to this story over several weeks, publishing article after article on spending at the Assembly. I suspected it was heading in this direction when they mentioned the Assembly "increased spending on itself". I hoped they would keep it in wider context – for example a single paragraph in a list of "spending crimes" - to attract the usual names in the comments section.
They seem to have opted for the ghoulie-grabber, and it's backfired stupendously.
There was an instant firestorm on social networking sites, and the inevitable petition was doing the rounds. The re-tweets and re-sends reached, within hours, more than double the WM's daily circulation. That in itself isn't a particularly good sign for the long-term future of the paper.
I believe I have to do something I didn't really want to do, but feel is necessary – defend the Western Mail. But first I'm going to have to dissect the story itself.
£400k – but where's the meat?
The story is based on conjecture and a figure that "could" happen at some point in the future. It's somewhat shoddy journalism that they should be embarrassed to have splashed over the front page.
Not for the first time, Martin Shipton and his team have placed their trust in anonymous "sources".
We've heard a lot from "sources" recently - including attacks on Leanne Wood from Labour. If these people are vain and arrogant enough to go into public affairs/politics in the first place, surely they should be big enough to show their face or put names to quotes?
To put things into context, £400,000 equates to:
This morning, the Western Mail, on its front page, published a "controversial" and harshly-worded editorial on possible future translation costs at the Assembly - accompanied by a picture of the dullest line up for Celebrity Squares in known history.
Proposed amendments to the Official Languages Bill - currently going through the legislative process - would require all proceedings to be bilingual - including committees - when at present, only plenary meetings are subject to it. The editorial claims that the projected £400,000 cost is excessive at a time when "budgets are squeezed and public services are being cut".
The Western Mail have been building up to this story over several weeks, publishing article after article on spending at the Assembly. I suspected it was heading in this direction when they mentioned the Assembly "increased spending on itself". I hoped they would keep it in wider context – for example a single paragraph in a list of "spending crimes" - to attract the usual names in the comments section.
They seem to have opted for the ghoulie-grabber, and it's backfired stupendously.
There was an instant firestorm on social networking sites, and the inevitable petition was doing the rounds. The re-tweets and re-sends reached, within hours, more than double the WM's daily circulation. That in itself isn't a particularly good sign for the long-term future of the paper.
I believe I have to do something I didn't really want to do, but feel is necessary – defend the Western Mail. But first I'm going to have to dissect the story itself.
£400k – but where's the meat?
The story is based on conjecture and a figure that "could" happen at some point in the future. It's somewhat shoddy journalism that they should be embarrassed to have splashed over the front page.
Not for the first time, Martin Shipton and his team have placed their trust in anonymous "sources".
We've heard a lot from "sources" recently - including attacks on Leanne Wood from Labour. If these people are vain and arrogant enough to go into public affairs/politics in the first place, surely they should be big enough to show their face or put names to quotes?
To put things into context, £400,000 equates to:
- About 0.9% of the Assembly's administration costs for 2012-13
- 0.003% of the entire budget of the Assembly
- About 3-and-a-bit Local Authority executives (out of God knows how many).
- One third of the Older People's Commissioner budget.
- Roughly the cost of 7 AM's annual salaries.
- Slightly less than the Value Wales budget. (No, I hadn't heard of them before either)
- £23million less than the Welsh Government have chosen not to use to counteract Council Tax Benefit cuts.
It's next to nothing in the grand scheme of things. I'll be posting on the much-vaunted Infrastructure and Housing Plans in the next couple of days and weeks. Having scanned through them, there's an awful lot of stuff in both that needs exposure. I'm not a particularly happy bunny.
I wish the Western Mail had such a strong reaction to the Green Investment Bank bid, effectively being lied to by the Health Minister, or that the recently-elected Cardiff Council is in the process of ripping apart one of the most ambitious urban development schemes in Wales. There's significantly more than £400k at stake there.
They've noticed that a gnome is out of place in the front garden, while ignoring that the house is on fire. Poor show. They've also made the - near suicidal -decision to weasel-in language like:
"....purist's devotion to an all-embracing bilingualism at any cost...."
How do you think that's going to be interpreted? It's a more erudite version of "monkey language" - entrenching Welsh as second-class to English. Isn't decent translation, in itself, a "public service"?
If cost-saving measures can be introduced, without compromising quality – great. But concentrating on relatively minor administrative details doesn't do any of us any favours.
They also make a distinction between plenary and committee, as though one is more important than the other. I'm sure some AMs - who seemingly do sod-all in the Assembly outside of the committees - in particular Labour back-benchers, will be pretty annoyed with that.
Politics is dull, largely rewardless, thankless, and most of the time seems to consist of saying not very nice things about other people, while believing with all your heart you're right even if you're completely wrong and know it. We expect our politicians to live like monks, and that's why there was such a backlash to the Westminster expenses scandal.
The day-to-day running of the legislature, however, isn't something at the top of most people's concerns I'd imagine. What our AMs do with their time there, and the decisions they make on the wider budget and laws, are far more important.
Overlooking the importance of the committees is more damaging to our democracy than lack of coverage or scrutiny. That's where most of the grunt-work is done in the Assembly.
FMQs is a sideshow in comparison. It's theatre, not politics. We can't afford to reduce public understanding of how the Assembly works to the weekly ego stroking and question dodging.
Having said all that....
We need somebody to keep the Assembly on its toes. Somebody has to go through the spending figures. Somebody has to dig the dirt. Somebody has to break the cosy consensus within the Assembly and provoke debate. Like it or not, the Western Mail is best placed to do that.
Recently I posted on the findings of the Task & Finish Group on the Welsh media. I said:
"With pressure being exerted on Welsh media outlets, for various reasons, it's vital that the perceivable decline is halted and turned around. No media. No accountability. No democracy."
Many are probably hoping that this is the final nail in the coffin of "Llais y Sais". Maybe they deserve it for pulling stunts like this. But that would be a catastrophe for Welsh civic life. There's no replacement - short of the Liverpool-based Daily Post "going national", the even more hysterical South Wales Echo become a low-brow, tabloid replacement, the Evening Post breaking out of south west Wales. Or even someone with a bottomless pit of cash stepping in, and propping up what is to all intents and purposes a dying medium.
It doesn't help when Western Mail attempts to commit seppuku, but I suspect it'll survive this because we have no other alternative other than BBC Wales and ITV Wales. Both of them are bit-players easily subsumed in larger pan-UK institutions. The Western Mail might be too within Trinity Mirror – a profitable part keeping the whole afloat – but they are the only source of highly-detailed analysis of Welsh politics, public life, sport and the economy.
For every editorial like this morning, there's an AWEMA scandal uncovered.
For every over the top headline about unemployment figures, there's a Wales Top 300 list.
When Welsh sport stories consist of a small column, tucked away in the back pages of the British press, it'll make the front page or back page of the Western Mail.
They can do better than this, and they've proven that more than once before. They've picked the wrong target. They'll probably need to apologise, or explain in more detail, their slight against the Welsh language to prevent the palpable anger turning into something that could affect the long-term survival of the newspaper.
However, they should never apologise for doing their job.
If anything, this "incident" highlights the need for greater plurality in our media, a rethink of how we want to hold the Assembly to account (and for what reasons) and some pretty determined actions by our politicians to make it so - as a matter of urgency.
